Skip to content

added definition of generic ESP32 to ARCH test #294

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2022
Merged

added definition of generic ESP32 to ARCH test #294

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2022

Conversation

ubidefeo
Copy link
Collaborator

@ubidefeo ubidefeo commented Jan 3, 2022

Some platforms do not define ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP32 in favour of their own (see InkPlate's ARCH_ARDUINO_INKPLATE). This will cause compilation to fail for those devices. Since every ESP32core definesESP32, this has been added to the ARCH test in order to define BOARD_ESP`

@ubidefeo
added definition of generic ESP32 to ARCH test
1a7ca4b 
Some platforms do not define `ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP32` in favour of their own (see InkPlate's `ARCH_ARDUINO_INKPLATE).
This will cause compilation to fail for those devices.
Since every `ESP32` core defines `ESP32`, this has been added to the ARCH test in order to define `BOARD_ESP`
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #294 (1a7ca4b) into master (070eb73) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #294   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.40%   95.40%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        1022     1022           
=======================================
  Hits          975      975           
  Misses         47       47

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 070eb73...1a7ca4b. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2022

Memory usage change @ 1a7ca4b

Board flash % RAM for global variables %
arduino:mbed:envie_m4 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:mbed:envie_m7 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0 0 - 0 0.0 - 0.0
Click for full report table
Board examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Advanced
flash		 % examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Advanced
RAM for global variables		 % examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Basic
flash		 % examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Basic
RAM for global variables		 % examples/utility/ArduinoIoTCloud_Travis_CI
flash		 % examples/utility/ArduinoIoTCloud_Travis_CI
RAM for global variables		 % examples/utility/Provisioning
flash		 % examples/utility/Provisioning
RAM for global variables		 % examples/utility/SelfProvisioning
flash		 % examples/utility/SelfProvisioning
RAM for global variables		 %
arduino:mbed:envie_m4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:mbed:envie_m7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Click for full report CSV 
Board,examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Advanced<br>flash,%,examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Advanced<br>RAM for global variables,%,examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Basic<br>flash,%,examples/ArduinoIoTCloud-Basic<br>RAM for global variables,%,examples/utility/ArduinoIoTCloud_Travis_CI<br>flash,%,examples/utility/ArduinoIoTCloud_Travis_CI<br>RAM for global variables,%,examples/utility/Provisioning<br>flash,%,examples/utility/Provisioning<br>RAM for global variables,%,examples/utility/SelfProvisioning<br>flash,%,examples/utility/SelfProvisioning<br>RAM for global variables,%
arduino:mbed:envie_m4,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:mbed:envie_m7,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:mbed_nano:nanorp2040connect,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:mkr1000,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,
arduino:samd:mkrgsm1400,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,
arduino:samd:mkrnb1500,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,
arduino:samd:mkrwan1300,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,,,,,
arduino:samd:mkrwifi1010,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0
arduino:samd:nano_33_iot,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0
esp32:esp32:esp32,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,,,,,
esp8266:esp8266:huzzah,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,0,0.0,,,,,,,,

@aentinger aentinger merged commit cb71b92 into arduino-libraries:master Jan 10, 2022
pennam pushed a commit to pennam/ArduinoIoTCloud that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2022
@ubidefeo @pennam
added definition of generic ESP32 to ARCH test (arduino-libraries#294)
eee5cba 
Some platforms do not define `ARDUINO_ARCH_ESP32` in favour of their own (see InkPlate's `ARCH_ARDUINO_INKPLATE).
This will cause compilation to fail for those devices.
Since every `ESP32` core defines `ESP32`, this has been added to the ARCH test in order to define `BOARD_ESP`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aentinger aentinger aentinger approved these changes

@eclipse1985 eclipse1985 Awaiting requested review from eclipse1985

@pennam pennam Awaiting requested review from pennam

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@ubidefeo @codecov-commenter @aentinger